MST-READI

(Medical Simulation TRaining TEchnology EvAluation DesIgner)

Home Background Getting Started Requirements & Design Evaluation Prototype Evaluation Guidance on evaluating a final simulation based training system Resources

TEE Models General Principles Simulation Characteristics Evaluation Methods Research Validity

TEE Models

       Home General Principles

A number of models have been developed presenting approaches to training evaluation research. Here we review two widely known models—Kirkpatrick’s model of training effectiveness, and the Training Intervention Evaluation Research (TIER) model.

Kirkpatrick’s 4-level model of Training Effectiveness Evaluation (1959) is perhaps the most commonly used framework for assessing training effectiveness:

Level Name Description Assessment Method
1

Reaction

How do participants react to the training?

participant reactions are typically assessed through self reports (e.g., participant feedback questionnaires, focus group sessions with participants, and recording informal participant comments observed by researchers)

2

Learning

To what extent does participant knowledge and skills improve (and attitudes change) as a results of training?

skill acquisition can be evaluated by administering pre- and post-test scores, examining simulation metrics, collecting on-the-job assessments, and by gathering supervisor ratings or reports of performance.  Attitude changes can also be captured through supervisor, co-worker and self reports

3

Behavior

To what extent did participants’ behavior transfer back to the workplace as a result of training?

Behavior transfer can be captured via self-assessment questionnaire, on-the-job observation and ratings from customers, peers and superiors

 

4

Results

What organizational benefits resulted from the training?

indicators of organization level effects of training can be obtained from unit performance reports, quality inspections, and interviews with organizational leaders

Moving from one level to the next – from training evaluation via individual trainee reactions through assessment of organizational results - presents increased complexity and a multitude of new challenges and threats to the validity of the research for the evaluator.  The training effect must be robust and the research design sensitive enough to capture the effect amid various extraneous variables.

The Training Intervention Effectiveness Research (TIER) model presents 4 stages to training effectiveness research, beginning with Formative and Process research during training development and moving to Outcome and Impact evaluation of the short and long term training impact, respectively, of the mature training program.

Stage Name Description
1

Formative Research

training needs, goals, and objectives are defined and initial training and assessment materials are developed with input from subject matter experts, end users and trainers

2

Process Research

preliminary materials and instructional strategies are pilot tested to assess the validity of instruments, and develop recommendations for refinement and finalization of materials

3

Outcome Research

focuses on determining if the training is affecting outcomes in the hypothesized direction, such as increasing skills or knowledge or reducing time to skill acquisition

4

Impact Assessment

the long term effects of the training on the individual, as well as the organization are investigated

 

       MST-READI is a collaborative research effort among US Army RDECOM-STTC, OSDi and CWS, funded by RDECOM-STTC     

 

 Home General Principles